As the year comes to a close, the InfoSec community looks back to another eventful and action-packed year. We hope you enjoy reading up on these informative reviews of 2017, and get ready for the new year with some great articles on how you can be better prepared in 2018.
“Are you prepared for a security breach? Not if you’re among the nearly half of security practitioners and business executives that admit they have no idea what they would do once a breach was discovered.”
“New Year’s resolutions are funny things. I’d place a strong wager that as 2016 was put to bed and 2017 awoke, a great many IT professionals made promises to themselves regarding their roles, their IT environments, and how they’d make changes to ensure that the organization’s IT infrastructure would run smoother and safer than ever.”
“In this article, we’ll deep dive into some of the metrics associated with our four-step methodology for qualifying threats and prioritizing risk (see details in part 2). The ultimate goal of metrics and controls – and of the entire security organization – is to lower risk to a palatable level for the business.”
“A misconfigured Amazon Web Services S3 storage bucket exposed sensitive data on consumers’ financial histories, contact information, and mortgage ownership.”
“A recent survey conducted by Black Book Research indicated the majority of healthcare provider and payer organizations are not taking cybersecurity seriously enough. Responses included 323 strategic decision makers from the US.”
“Poor risk management leads to a slippery slope of weak prioritization, wasted resources, and unaddressed security issues. Most businesses don’t know how to quantify and manage risk, and their failures lead to repeating the same security problems and facing new, major ones.”
“2016 may have killed every famous person we ever cared about, but it was tame compared to the dumpster fire of security screw-ups and privacy violations that 2017 had in store. Here’s our look back.”
“Business Risk Intelligence (BRI), as I’ve written previously, is becoming a new industry standard. As someone who’s faced the limitations of cyber threat intelligence (CTI) — BRI’s predecessor — firsthand, I can attest to the immense value to be gleaned from abandoning CTI’s indicator-centric approach in favor of a comprehensive BRI program. But since BRI’s enterprise-wide focus is a relatively new and less-familiar concept, I realize that some organizations might be unsure of how to initiate and maintain a BRI program effectively.”
“There’s an axiom used by security professionals that states: “You can’t secure what you can’t see.” This rather simplistic statement actually has many different meanings when it comes to securing a business because of the rapidly growing number of network blind spots that exist in today’s information technology infrastructure.”
“As we look to the New Year many of us make resolutions – getting healthier, learning a new skill, saving money, or making more time for family and friends. With 2018 just around the corner, the challenge now is to stick to that resolution and this is where many of us fail. Often the goal is too broad, or we don’t have a plan for achieving it.”
“These five steps will you help marshal the internal resources you need to reduce risk, break down barriers, and thwart cyber attacks.”
“Nissan Canada’s finance business revealed on Thursday that all of its 1.13 million current and former customers may have had their details compromised in a data breach.”
“66 percent of organizations would not recover from a cyberattack if it occurred today. Is your organization prepared? Here’s what every CIO and CISO needs to know to start or improve their cybersecurity recovery plan.”
“If CISOs could make a wish to solve a problem, these would be among the top choices.”
What does cybersecurity mean to your business? This might seem like an odd question, but how an enterprise responds to it can say a lot about the culture and practice of cybersecurity within that organization. There are many different ways to ask the same question — Which function does cybersecurity report to within the enterprise? Who are the internal clients of cybersecurity? Does cybersecurity leadership have a voice at the highest levels of corporate decision-making? There are 2 main schools of thought about the role and orientation of cybersecurity within the enterprise. The traditional school places cybersecurity within the Information Technology (IT) function of a business. In this model cybersecurity reports to IT, IT is the internal client for cybersecurity, and the CISO might report up to the CTO or CIO. It’s easy to see why one might make this association. IT and cybersecurity professionals often have similar or adjacent skillsets and overlapping educational and professional backgrounds. Both functions often deal with highly technical, specialized, and complex information and processes. However, the goals and KPIs of IT and cybersecurity are not only unaligned, they are often in direct conflict. The internal clients for IT are other business functions that essentially pay for the various technology assets (applications, servers, cloud instances, etc.) required to keep the enterprise running. IT performance is evaluated by how seamlessly, continuously, and cheaply they are able to deliver their services. IT doesn’t really have visibility into or an understanding of how these assets are being used by the business, what kind of data they process, which critical business functions they support. When cybersecurity comes to IT and tells them that a particular technology asset or part of the IT infrastructure has problems or weaknesses that could be exploited by malicious actors, they have to weigh the benefits — stopping a potential attack that may or may not happen vs. the costs — resources allocated to fix the problem, unhappy internal clients due to technology assets being unavailable during fixing, valuable time spent fixing and validating the issue. This is a hard sell and essentially amounts to self-regulation. A significant percentage of breaches exploit known vulnerabilities and weaknesses within an organization. Looked at from this lens, it's not difficult to see how such problems can go unaddressed. The modern school of thought recognizes Cybersecurity as its own independent vertical within the enterprise — like sales, marketing, HR, or any other function whose purpose is to help the business function and thrive. In this model, cybersecurity has various different business functions as internal clients, and the CISO might have a seat at the C-level table. Cybersecurity informs business stakeholders of the risks they face as a result of the technology infrastructure they utilize. The business stakeholders provide the context necessary for informed risk triage and collaborate with cybersecurity to identify which vulnerabilities or weaknesses pose the biggest threats to the part of business they own. These prioritized risks are then sent to IT for remediation. Cybersecurity provides guidance to IT on how they may remediate or mitigate a particular problem. Since risk remediation or mitigation is being driven by the business stakeholders, IT is incentivized to fix these problems. Risk-based cybersecurity is a methodology for program design that can help organizations put this modern approach into practice. By putting an emphasis on incorporating business context in the risk analysis process and data models, and by ensuring that business stakeholders are involved in the decision chain, risk-based cybersecurity programs provide a shared space where IT, business, and cybersecurity can come together and collaborate.
I'm proud and excited to announce that Brinqa has raised $110 Million in growth capital from leading global venture capital and private equity firm Insight Partners. This is our first institutional investment and represents a significant milestone for the company. Brinqa was bootstrapped and remained founder-backed as we shaped the Cyber Risk Management space, achieved strong organic growth and profitability, and acquired some of the biggest brand names in the world as customers. This new injection of funds combined with Insight Partners' ScaleUp expertise will fuel the next stage of our growth and accelerate ongoing efforts to make Brinqa an essential, unifying component of every enterprise cybersecurity ecosystem. Our mission, values, and objectives as a company remain the same; this partnership will help us achieve them faster and better. We decided to take this step with Insight Partners because of how aligned they are with our vision for Brinqa and the priority of long-term and short-term goals. We firmly believe that Brinqa is an essential platform for all enterprise cybersecurity organizations. As digital transformation proliferates across industries and saturates every aspect of business, the IT infrastructure to enable and the security ecosystem to protect become larger and more complex. Imagine a scenario where hundreds of different teams, systems, and programs — each focused on a task so demanding and technical that it requires specialized skills and tools — work towards the same overarching goal but rarely communicate with each other. Unfortunately, this is often the reality for most cybersecurity organizations. To be effective and a true contributor to business success, it must function as ONE TEAM aligned in purpose, connected in data, and transparent in communication. This is the vision that Brinqa helps our customers achieve. We know that this is possible because we have proven it at some of the world's largest and most complex enterprise IT environments. We are fortunate to count among our customers three out of the five largest retail companies in the world, the largest healthcare providers in the US, and the most prominent global brands in technology, financial services, insurance, healthcare, manufacturing, aviation, and critical infrastructure. This partnership will help us bring this vision to cybersecurity practitioners and organizations everywhere. The capital infusion will be used to accelerate sales and marketing initiatives, enhance customer experience and community building, and strengthen partner and channel ecosystems. I am so thankful to the Brinqa family — our employees, customers, and partners. You are the source of the immeasurable hard work, innovation, creativity, and conviction it has taken to reach this huge milestone, and all credit for this accomplishment goes to you. I am excited as we embark on this next stage of our journey and look forward to achieving greater heights together.
Microsoft Exchange Zero-Day Attackers Spy on U.S. Targets Microsoft has spotted multiple zero-day exploits in the wild being used to attack on-premises versions of Microsoft Exchange Server. Read More Critical Microsoft Defender Bug Actively Exploited; Patch Tuesday Offers 83 Fixes The first Patch Tuesday security bulletin for 2021 from Microsoft includes fixes for one bug under active attack, possibly linked to the massive SolarWinds hacks. Microsoft addressed 10 critical bugs, one under active exploit and another publicly known, in its January Patch Tuesday roundup of fixes. In total it patched 83 vulnerabilities. Read More Critical Cisco SD-WAN Bugs Allow RCE Attacks Cisco is warning of multiple, critical vulnerabilities in its software-defined networking for wide-area networks (SD-WAN) solutions for business users. Read More SonicWall Breach Stems from ‘Probable’ Zero-Days SonicWall is investigating 'probable' zero-day flaws in its remote access security products that have been targeted by 'highly-sophisticated' attackers. The company says it is investigating the attack and will update customers within 24 hours. Read More Cisco DNA Center Bug Opens Enterprises to Remote Attack A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Cisco Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Center could open enterprise users to remote attack and takeover. The high-severity security vulnerability (CVE-2021-1257) allows cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. Read More Industrial Gear at Risk from Fuji Code-Execution Bugs Industrial control software (ICS) from Fuji Electric is vulnerable to several high-severity arbitrary code-execution security bugs, according to a federal warning. Authorities are warning the flaws could allow physical attacks on factory and critical-infrastructure equipment. Read More