Solution Comparison
Brinqa vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (Kenna Security)
See why customers choose Brinqa over Cisco to manage cyber risk across their attack surface.

Feature Comparison
Attack Surface Coverage
Risk Scoring
Automated Remediation
Dashboards & Reporting
Asset Management
Attack Surface Coverage
Brinqa
✅ Full attack surface coverage that spans all security tools (infrastructure, AppSec, cloud security & more)
✅ Easily connect to hundreds of data sources to leverage the tools & systems you’re already using
✅ Builds custom data connectors for free
Cisco
❌ Doesn’t incorporate security findings outside of traditional infrastructure
❌ Lists less than 60 data connectors on their website
Risk Scoring
Brinqa
✅ Risk scores are transparent and personalized to your business
✅ Transforms how your organization prioritizes risk with scores that incorporate business context
✅ Remediation prioritization your stakeholders trust
Cisco
❌ One-size-fits-all risk scores don’t reflect your business priorities
❌ Stakeholders question risk scores and don’t take action
Automated Remediation
Brinqa
✅ Brinqa automatically creates remediation tickets, assigns ownership, track SLAs & groups vulnerabilities for faster remediation
✅ Bi-directionally syncs with dev/IT project management tools (Jira, ServiceNow, etc.) for closed loop remediation tracking
Cisco
❌ No automated remediation. For each issue, you must right click to create a remediation ticket.
Dashboards & Reporting
Brinqa
✅ Personalize to audience (Executive, IT/Dev remediation owner, security)
✅ Data from entire attack surface is available (infrastructure, AppSec, cloud security & more)
✅ Highly configurable to easily customize dashboards & reports
Cisco
❌ Lacks customization & no business context for executive audiences
❌ Limited data provides narrow view of attack surface
Asset Management